Weekend Retrospective | Bo Jackson: Hustler

Weekend Retrospective | Bo Jackson: Hustler 1

28 years ago on this very date, June the 7th, Bo Jackson, perhaps the greatest pure athlete in the history of humans made his major league baseball debut for the Kansas City Royals. There’s never been anyone like him before, and there’s never been anyone like him since.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/RX82AEh7CrQ”%5D

For anyone not around to experience exactly what it was that Bo Jackson brought to the table, ESPN’s “30 for 30” profile on Bo Jackson is as good as it’s going to get. And don’t forget, not only was Bo a tremendous all-around talent on the baseball diamond (okay, his batting average was never anything to write poems about), Bo was also as dominant a runner as a tailback that the NFL had ever seen.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/H0GCixb2QjI”%5D

As tremendous as Bo was at “the baseball,” an All-Star calibur player if there every was one, nobody was confusing him with Frank Robinson or Hank Aaron either. Bo was never going to be Cooperstown bound. But if not for his unfortunate injury while playing football, it’s almost an undoubted certainty that Bo would have been enshrined at Canton. He was literally unstoppable.

Though his career was brief, the legacy of Bo Jackson is forever with us. His highlight reels are ridiulous. What he did transcended not one game, but two.

The man guest-starred in TV shows like “Fresh Prince” and “Married …With Children.”

Weekend Retrospective | Bo Jackson: Hustler 1

Had his own cartoon series about him and fellow super-athletes Michael Jordan & Wayne Gretzky.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/px5njG8ikvo”%5D

And, perhaps his most important achievement of all, he exposed Brian Bosworth for what he was – a nobody – in a hyped Raiders-Seahawks “Monday Night Football” game which saw Bo run “The ‘Bos” over en route to a TD.An occurence which finally shut Bosworth’s lips from flapping and snuffed our the Brian-Bosworth-Gravy-Train movement, which was trying to manufacture him into a star outside of football. Bo pretty much said, “Fuck that nonsense.”

Weekend Retrospective | Bo Jackson: Hustler 2

Let us also not forgot, the epic Tecmo Super Bowl TD-run uploaded onto YouTube back in 2006.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/8PBvOxicz-0″%5D

Over 1.7 million YouTube views, bitches. Suck upon that.

The decade of the 1980s was indeed an interesting time. Socially and economically it was most certainly a dark era. We can thank the douchebaggery of Ronald Reagan and his economics along with his wife with the infamous lips’ disastrous War On Drugs for a lot of that. But in the realm of sports, the 1980s saw the greatest hockey player who ever lived: Gretzky, make his mark. It saw the greatest basketball player who ever lived: Jordan, do things on the basketball floor that no guard had ever done before; all prior to establishing himself as he best all-around player ever in the following decade. And don’t forget, in boxing, for a brief few years, Mike Tyson achieved levels of unparalleled technical excellence that would have made even Muhammad Ali cower in fear. Though Bo Jackson was certainly not the greatest baseball, nor football, player to ever lace up for those games – his alchemical-like all-around athletic prowess of raw speed & power at his position is something that football hasn’t come close to seeing again. Those same attributes allowed him to do things on the baseball field that to this day still make people go, “wow.”

Since Gretzky, hockey fans have had a chance to see the likes of Crosby and Ovenchkin. Since Jordan, basketball fans have had a chance to watch Kobe and LeBron. Since Tyson, well nevermind. Since Tyson boxing has been in the toilet. But good luck waiting for the next Bo Jackson to come around. Happen; not gonna.

Weekend Retrospective | Hunter S. “Power Is” Mac commercial

Iconoclasm has been embedded in marketing campaigns for a long time now. Here is a perfect example. Take a look at this 1990 Hunter S. Thompson commercial for Macs. Go fuck yourself Justin Long.

Weekend Retrospective | The Greg Anthony-Charles Barkley Paradox

In case you haven’t seen it, Charles Barkley and Greg Anthony are starring in a Capital One television ad together. While there are few things that I detest more than television commercials, in this instance I feel sharing the ad as being extremely pertinent. Have a look.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/5iBz7qz0CTg”%5D

Now you might be asking yourself, “What is it about this commercial that is so interesting that it warrants any attention at all? It’s Charles Barkley and Greg Anthony together in an advertisement, what’s the big deal?” To answer questions such as those one has to go back in time.

In 1991 the New York Knicks created a big splash when they hired former Lakers coach and the current-at-the-time NBC commentator Pat Riley as their new head coach.

2008_04_ewingriley

By late-winter of ’93, under Riley’s genius, the Knick franchise had been revitalized and grown a reputation as the most intimidating team ever to hit the hardwood at the NBA level. Rather than focusing on constructing a “Showtime” offense like he had previously done in L.A., Riley realized that to turn the Patrick Ewing Knicks into a contender he was going to have to take an entirely different approach. His focus would be on defense. But it wasn’t just your typical run-of-the-mill defensive schemes, blocking of shots, rebounding and the forcing of turnovers Riley was looking to stress; sure all of that would be necessary, but Coach wanted that added edge on the defensive side of the ball. What would be his secret ingredient? Intimidation. Riley brought in or expanded the roles of a number of players during his first two years who would come to be known for their defensive prowess, fearless blue-collar-like work ethic and an innate ability to intimidate their oppenets.

Along with Ewing, Charles Oakley was already an established star on the team. John Starks on the other hand was a seldom used CBA-reject coming off the bench. Riley would go on to sign another ex-CBA player in Anthony Mason and expand Starks’s role on the team.

john-starks-anthony-mason

Riley would also be instrumental in making the trade for Xavier McDaniel in ’91, and the feisty Glen “Doc” Rivers the following season. And of course his first draft pick with the Knicks would be none other than the UNLV NCAA championship-winning Runnin’ Rebel point guard; Greg Anthony.

anthony draft

The four seasons Riley spent as coach of the Knicks would be marked by a brand of basketball that revolutionized how the NBA would play defense forever. It stressed slowing the game down, contesting every single shot and allowing zero to no lay-ups. Lay-ups were deemed unnacceptable. This often meant a lot of physical fouls needing to be levied against their opponents to make that last point clear. Riley’s Knicks made the “Bad Boy” Pistons of a few years prior, whom he modeled the Knicks after, seem meek by comparison.

Brandishing that style of basketball philosophy, it was in 1992 that the upstart Knicks took on the defending champion Chicago Bulls to the brink in a classic, though vicious, seven-game series. Naturally the Bulls won, they did have Jordan after all, but just barely. It wasn’t supposed to be that close of a series.

Patrick Ewing, Charles Oakley, Xavier McDaniel

Though they had Ewing, the Riley-led Knicks did have one glaring weakness: a lack of talent equivocal to the amount of wins they’d chalk up. Everyone knew the McDaniel could play, but Anthony Mason and John Starks weren’t exactly Dave DeBusschere and Earl Monroe. Greg Anthony showed a lot of promise as a potential point guard of the future with his hard-nosed style of play off the bench, but nobody was confusing him with Micheal Ray Richardson. They simply weren’t supposed to be that good that soon. But they were. A big reason as to why the Knicks were successful had to do with the fact that they bullied every team they came across – even the vaunted Bulls. That 1992 playoff series is famous for the punishment the Bulls players were subject to. Scottie Pippen’s abuse at the hands of McDaniel in particular.

It was clear that Horace Grant and Bill Cartwright wanted no part in dealing with McDaniel, Oakley and Mason. It is likely that Pippen still has nightmarish visions of the eyebrowless menace, Xavier McDaniel, in his sleep. Jordan, on the other hand, wasn’t one to back down.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/DE4pu5bwdbU”%5D

Out of all six of Michael Jordan’s championship runs, that 1992 series against the Knicks was in all reality the one serious threat Chicago had to being eliminated. The series was so hard on Chicago that many feel Jordan (who just so happened to share the same agent as Xavier) and the league had McDaniel sign any other team other than the Knicks after just that one season.

Nevertheless, the Knicks had now established themselves as a team to be reckoned with.

nyk

Despite losing McDaniel, the Knicks were even better than they had been the previous year in ’92-93. In all of their meetings with New York that season it was still evident that Chicago still remembered the beating they took at the hands of the Knicks the previous spring. As March of ’93 was coming to a close the Knicks were looking like they were every bit the “Beast of the East,” as they were now being billed – as well as being the best team in the league top to bottom. Towards the end of that month the Knicks had on their schedule a west coast trip that included their only visit to Phoenix. The Knicks would be up against Charles Barkley and his new team, the Suns.

If there was one other club that could lay claim to being the best team in the league at that particular point in time, it would have been Phoenix. At tip-off on that March 23rd night in the America West Arena, that particular game in the NBA was significant due to the fact that it was the league’s top two teams meeting in a game – which Phoenix would eventually win, by the way – that might have offered everyone a sneak peak into what that year’s Finals match-up would be. Both sides were amped up and ready to make statements. When the horn blew ending the game, however, it would be remembered for something else – because on that night this happened:

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/rTYQSYzf5Mk”%5D

It was ugly. It was an incident that the league never forgave Riley and the Knicks for. Brawls are never deemed good for business in the NBA, but a player who isn’t even suited up for the game to attack another player while swearing street clothes? Damn, son. It was a surreal scene to say the least.

As for Barkley, who already had no love for the Knicks going into this game, this incident – Anthony’s actions against Kevin Johnson in particular – was an outrage. He already harbored a deep resentment for the Knicks after they had brought out brooms on Philadelphia’s home floor after sweeping his 76ers out of the playoffs in three games during the 1989 Playoffs. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back, in so far as his disdain for New York went anyway.

If you ever watch the NBA on TNT and listen to Sir Charles elucidate Knicks basketball in pre, halftime and post-game shows, it’d be hard not to come away thinking that the Round Mound doesn’t have a personal gripe with the basketball team hailing from New York. This is not to say his analysis isn’t accurate. It’s pretty much spot on. The Knicks have been awful for fifteen years now, so it’s not as if he has to make anything up. But if you know the history than you get why there always seems to be a little zest in Barkley’s criticisms of the New York Knicks over the years. It’s as irritating to listen to as it is amusing.

That ’92-93 season the Knicks finished with a franchise-best 60 wins. A rematch with the Bulls was inevitable on their way to what most were predicting as a championship season for the Knicks. Their defense was just too good. It was simply a matter of getting past Jordan and the Bulls, something that the Knicks were favored to do as the re-match of that series began. Only thing was, despite winning the first two games of that series – capped by John Starks’s famous dunk (the most overrated dunk in franchise history), the Bulls still had Jordan.

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/pCTfxOrX4k8″%5D

Jordan being Jordan was sick of losing to the Knicks already. Enough was enough. In epic Jordanian fashion MJ led the Bulls to an improbable four straight victories, once again eliminating the Knicks. Phoenix was there waiting for New York in the Finals, but they got a determined Michael Jordan-led Chicago team instead, and he smoked them too.

1993 was the year either Ewing or Barkley was supposed to win his championship. A Knicks-Suns rematch would have been compelling, but Michael Jordan had other ideas. Much to the elatation of David Stern we can be assured. The last thing Stern and the NBA would have wanted was to have their golden goose displaced from the Finals by the “thuggish” Knicks – a franchise viewed as responsible, due to Greg Anthony’s actions most particularly, for the ugliest scene in the NBA since Kermit Washington caught Rudy Tomjanovich with a punch so square it nearly knocked his head off (#6 in the video below).

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/sBNNAvyspGs”%5D

The previous year’s playoff series with Chicago was ugly enough, but that brawl in Phoenix took the cake. If the Knicks being in the Finals instead of the Bulls wasn’t an odious enough concept for the league to contemplate, it was only made all the more horrifying of a scenario that their opponents would very likely be the Suns. What kind of scene might have unfolded had the Knicks and Suns met again in 1993? We’ll never know.

It’s now 2014. Charles Barkley’s routine as the nonsensical no-nonsense commentator since his retirement is a staple of the NBA-on-TV experience. Everyone knew Barkley had a future in the media. This comes as no surpise. But going back fifteen to twenty years ago, nobody saw what Greg Anthony would be coming.

Weekend Retrospective | The Greg Anthony-Charles Barkley Paradox 1

Greg is now the well-respected corporate and conservative face of basketball as both a studio analyst and game time color commentator at both the college and professional level. He’s as good at what he does as the industry has today. Greg Anthony is so well-respected and in the good graces of corporate America that he’s now the straight pitch man for Capital One in a TV ad. What’s more, Charles Barkley is his comic relief in said ad.

Irony is a motherfucker.

Weekend Retrospective | Vintage Skate Photos From New York in the 60s

BuzzFeed recently posted a collection of vintage photos of people enjoying that newfangled fad-item of early-to-mid-1960s American culture: the skateboard. There are some fascinating images in this collection, here’s a look at some of the more interesting photos. You gotta love these images. The more some things change, the more they remain the same.   via BF

Weekend Retrospective 1
Weekend Retrospective 2
Weekend Retrospective 3
Weekend Retrospective 4
Weekend Retrospective 5

Weekend Retrospective | Andy Warhol’s Clockwork Orange

Weekend Retrospective | Andy Warhol's A Clockwork Orange 1

Stanley Kubrick’s 1971 film adaptation of Anthony  Burgess’ dystopian satire novel A Clockwork Orange is considered by just about all film critics and enthusiasts alike as one of the greatest motion pictures ever produced. Since the American Film Institute started releasing compendiums of the most significant 100 American films every ten years, Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange has made the cut both times those lists have been issued: 1997 and 2007. Expect for it to remain on the list in 2017 as well.

Here is an interesting fact most people don’t know – including myself until just recently: Stanley Kubrick was not the first to produce a feature-lenth film adaptation to Burgess’ novel. In 1965 none other than Andy Warhol produced and directed his take on the tale in his 1965 film Vinyl. It took the OpenCulture blog’s recently posted entry on this curious twist in American sub-pop culture for myself to be made aware of it’s existence.

Weekend Retrospective | Andy Warhol's A Clockwork Orange 2

It’s not considered the most faithful adaptation of a novel-into-film ever. Here is what the International Anthony Burgess Foundation has to say about Warhol’s vision:

“Vinyl is such a loose adaptation of the source novel that even people who have seen it should be forgiven for not realising that it is built on Burgess’s literary scaffold.”

OpenCulture also quotes the foundation as saying:

The film is presented as a series of images of brutality, beatings, torture and masochism all performed by a group of men under the gaze of a glamorous woman. In its preoccupations with pornography and violence, it bears many of the oblique hallmarks of Warhol’s work, along with a familiar cast of Factory regulars such as Gerard Malanga, Edie Sedgwick and Ondine. The finished film is disturbing, contains unsimulated violent acts and is not very audience-friendly.

Well, I can’t speak for anyone else, but that certainly piques my attention. If it does yours as well you can presently view the film on YouTube in seven parts.

[youtube_sc url=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuENhAm5Tks&feature=share&list=PL15BF27E9090A5E35″%5D

The IABF does not exactly shower Warhol’s film with glowing words of praise. That might have something to do with the fact that Warhol, as also reported by OC, failed to pay any licensing fees for the right to turn Burgess’ novel into a movie. That’s not exactly surprising. As you can tell, Warhol wasn’t exactly working with a big budget – nor did he produce his movie with any commercial aspirations. If you want to see sublime dystopian filmmaking in it’s highest form stick to the Kubrick version. If you want to read one of the great Cold War-era novels, go down to your local libray and check out the Burgess book. If, however, you’re a hipster, part of the hard-core arthouse scene, an Andy Warhol fan in general or any combination of the three you might find Vinyl as something which may pertain to your interests.